Chart-ready data

Visual Data

Data tables for the MCP Memory Server Sector Radar. All figures are frozen at the 2026-05-10 evidence snapshot and follow the SC-013 display standard: denominator, source, and reader meaning must stay visible beside public metrics.

Display Contract

Reference implementation update for Operations/SECTOR-RADAR-DISPLAY-STANDARD.md. MCP Memory Servers metrics use either the in-cluster corpus of N=20 repositories or the full corpus of N=32 repositories. Each section below names the sample, source artifact, and reader meaning.

Display AreaDenominator / SamplePrimary SourceReader Meaning
Cluster compositionIn-cluster, N=20; full corpus, N=32Visual Data Charts 1-2; calibration role assignmentsShows sector shape inside the retained cluster and the wider discovery boundary.
Health metricsIn-cluster, N=20 and full corpus, N=32Visual Data Chart 4; calibration score matrixCompares convergence, differentiation, viability, scaffold rate, integrity, and leakage.
Centroid traitsIn-cluster, N=20Visual Data Chart 5; centroid artifactShows which traits define the default MCP memory-server pattern.
Score scatter tablesDisplayed examples from the full corpus, N=32Visual Data Charts 3 and 6; calibration tableShows how sector position, differentiation, human engineering depth, and adoption relate.

Cluster Composition

Denominator: in-cluster, N=20, and full corpus, N=32. Source: Reports/VISUAL-DATA.md Charts 1-2 and Manual-audit/CALIBRATION-TABLE-RADAR.md. Reader meaning: role share shows how many projects sit inside the sector default, how many are distinct, and how many appeared because adjacent infrastructure shares the discovery surface.

In-Cluster Roles

Differentiated Niche
45%
Inactive Scaffold
25%
Category Leader
10%
Strong Default
10%
Baseline Implementation
10%

Full Corpus Roles

Differentiated Niche
31%
Adjacent Infrastructure
25%
Inactive Scaffold
16%
Baseline Implementation
9%
Category Leader
6%
Strong Default
6%
Reference Implementation
3%
Edge Case
3%

Health Metrics

These metrics compare the retained MCP memory-server cluster with the broader discovery corpus. Category Leakage here is discovery-boundary leakage: 8 of 32 full-corpus rows are Adjacent Infrastructure projects that appeared in the wider sector search space.

MetricValueScaleDenominator / SampleSourceReader Meaning
Corpus denominator20NIn-cluster, N=20Visual Data Source-of-Truth TableRetained repositories used for centroid and in-cluster health claims.
Corpus denominator32NFull corpus, N=32Visual Data Source-of-Truth TableWider discovery corpus including adjacent, reference, self, and edge-case rows.
Convergence Index4.350-5In-cluster, N=20Visual Data Chart 4High convergence around the MCP memory-server centroid.
Convergence Index3.50-5Full corpus, N=32Visual Data Chart 4Lower corpus-wide convergence once adjacent infrastructure is included.
Differentiation Index3.10-5In-cluster, N=20Visual Data Chart 4Moderate differentiation inside the retained cluster.
Differentiation Index3.40-5Full corpus, N=32Visual Data Chart 4Higher differentiation when adjacent infrastructure is included.
Viability Rate60%%In-cluster, N=20Visual Data Chart 4Share of retained projects showing enough sustained engineering to look viable.
Viability Rate66%%Full corpus, N=32Visual Data Chart 4Corpus-wide viability rises because adjacent infrastructure includes mature projects.
Scaffold Rate25%%In-cluster, N=20Visual Data Chart 4One in four retained MCP memory servers is structurally present but implementation-light.
Scaffold Rate16%%Full corpus, N=32Visual Data Chart 4Scaffold share drops across the wider corpus.
Integrity Index3.80-5In-cluster, N=20Visual Data Chart 4Claims generally map to implementation evidence inside the retained cluster.
Integrity Index3.90-5Full corpus, N=32Visual Data Chart 4Corpus-wide claim/implementation integrity remains similar.
Category Leakage25%%Full corpus, N=32Visual Data Chart 4Discovery-boundary leakage: 8/32 rows are adjacent infrastructure rather than retained MCP memory servers.
Adoption Concentration15%%In-cluster, N=20Visual Data Chart 4Only a small retained subset reaches high adoption depth.

Centroid Trait Prevalence

Denominator: in-cluster, N=20. Source: Reports/VISUAL-DATA.md Chart 5 and Manual-audit/CENTROID-MCP-MEMORY-32.md. Reader meaning: prevalence shows which evidence-backed traits define the MCP memory-server default pattern.

C1 MCP-primary
95%
C2 Session continuity
95%
C7 Vocabulary
90%
C9 Single-developer
80%
C5 Local-first
75%
C8 Single-command install
70%
C3 Embedded storage
65%

Score Matrix Context

Denominator: full corpus, N=32, with in-cluster rows marked separately where relevant. Source: Manual-audit/CALIBRATION-TABLE-RADAR.md and the visual-data tables on this page. Reader meaning: the score matrix explains how public role labels are derived without turning a repo row into a universal quality verdict.

Score KeyScaleQuestion AnsweredPrimary Source
CM0-5How closely the repo matches the MCP memory-server centroid.Centroid match scoring table and calibration rows.
DF0-5How much observable differentiation appears beyond the default pattern.Calibration rows and source notes.
HE0-5How much sustained engineering evidence is visible.Calibration rows and audit traces.
AD0-5How much adoption signal exists at the snapshot date.Calibration rows and public repository metadata.
CI0-5Whether claims match implementation evidence.Calibration rows and source trace notes.

Centroid Match vs Differentiation

Sample: displayed examples from the full corpus, N=32. Source: Reports/VISUAL-DATA.md Chart 3 and calibration table. Reader meaning: CM means Centroid Match and DF means Differentiation; together they show whether a repo is close to the default sector pattern, distinct within it, or adjacent to it.

RepoCMDFRoleCategory
claude-mem54Category LeaderIn-Cluster
mcp-memory-service45Category LeaderIn-Cluster
MemPalace55Differentiated NicheIn-Cluster
memory-bank-mcp31Baseline ImplementationIn-Cluster
mem0-mcp40Inactive ScaffoldIn-Cluster
Mem015Adjacent InfrastructureAdjacent
Graphiti04Adjacent InfrastructureAdjacent
Rekindle55Differentiated NicheReference/Self
mcp-server (official)32Reference ImplementationReference
claude-memory-compiler23Edge CaseEdge Case

Adoption Depth vs Human-Edge

Sample: displayed examples from the full corpus, N=32. Source: Reports/VISUAL-DATA.md Chart 6 and calibration table. Reader meaning: HE means Human-Edge and AD means Adoption Depth; this view separates sustained engineering from public reach.

RepoHEADRoleCategory
claude-mem45Category LeaderIn-Cluster
mcp-memory-service55Category LeaderIn-Cluster
ByteRover52Differentiated NicheIn-Cluster
memory-bank-mcp25Baseline ImplementationIn-Cluster
persistent-context-mcp00Inactive ScaffoldIn-Cluster
Mem055Adjacent InfrastructureAdjacent
Graphiti55Adjacent InfrastructureAdjacent
Rekindle51Differentiated NicheReference/Self
mcp-server (official)45Reference ImplementationReference
supermemory-mcp23Baseline ImplementationEdge Case

Source Artifacts

All source data for these tables is published alongside the report. Found a stale repo, wrong source trace, or boundary classification issue? Send a correction to hello@diversum.dev with the repo name, displayed value, and source that should replace it.

Published ArtifactSource RoleVisible Metric Families
Manual-audit/CENTROID-MCP-MEMORY-32.mdCentroid traits and prevalence countsCentroid trait prevalence and in-cluster denominator.
Manual-audit/CALIBRATION-TABLE-RADAR.mdPer-repo scores, evidence notes, cluster roles, and category labelsRole composition, score examples, health metrics, and leakage.
Reports/VISUAL-DATA.mdChart-ready aggregations derived from calibrationAll displayed chart and table aggregations on this page.
Reports/SECTOR-RADAR-MCP-MEMORY-SERVERS.mdPublic narrative reportReader framing, sector interpretation, limitations, and methodology references.
Operations/Sprint-Contracts/SC-010.mdOriginal MCP Memory Servers report-generation scopeReport package acceptance context.
Operations/SECTOR-RADAR-DISPLAY-STANDARD.mdSC-013 display contractDenominator, source trace, public label, role color, and correction-path requirements.